Archives for posts with tag: Donald Trump

Regardless of whether you think he’s the only legitimate use of Godwin’s law, Donald Trump’s success has turned politics into the real-life circus that newspaper cartoonists have been prophetically satirizing for decades. I won’t bother explaining why Donald Trump is terrible. I figure if you’re a supporter of Trump and you’ve miraculously stumbled across this blog, your literacy levels would have prevented you from progressing past the word “legitimate”, and you have already given up reading. Thus it’s a safe bet we’re all in political agreement so far.

Where we might differ is that I don’t believe that Donald Trump is the failure of democracy, but the culmination of it. Plato in his Republic decries democracy as pandering to the masses, where the success of a leader is determined not by their ability to lead or their wisdom, but by their ability to appeal to the bulk of the people. Considering the Greeks invented the damn thing, it seems that even in its infancy democracy has borne the seed of the pupating Trump.

Donald Trump is unique among politicians in that he isn’t one. Trump is heralded as a man who brazenly speaks his mind among sleazy, lying politicians. Except Trump makes just as many false promises as those sleazy politicians and flip-flops on controversial topics depending on who he is speaking to. He is more overtly racist and misogynistic than his peers, but surely that can’t be his method of success.

Donald Trump is not a politician, but a salesman, and in a political system that inherently relies on image over substance, we see how his popularity is not an anomaly but is almost predestined by our adherence to it. And Trump is an amazing salesman. A linguist analyzed Trump’s response to a simple question, and found that he uses repetition, punchy, simplistic language, and a speaking style that subconsciously elicits agreement. Again, there is little of substance in what he says, but the way he says it manipulatively charms those who aren’t paying attention.

We live in an age where advertising has the finest tools of psychology behind it. I mean, ads directed to kids have so much psychological juju that they can sell cereal that is just a few grams away from being bowls of actual sugar under the guise of being a nutritionally healthy choice. Trump knows all these tricks; how else could it be explained that several bankruptcies, a grocery list of failed business plans, and pending lawsuits don’t dissuade people from associating the name Trump with success? John Oliver dedicated an entire segment to showcasing this phenomenon, and he concluded that the brand is so well marketed that disassociating Donald from the name Trump is the optimal solution since convincing people to rebel against their advertorial mind-control is a depressingly futile endeavour.

One might argue that the stupidification of the American public is more to blame than the problems inherent to the democratic system, and this is a fair point. A nation full of well-educated, critical thinking individuals would more than likely vote for someone better qualified than Trump. Though, a nation full of baboons would vote for someone better qualified than Trump, so maybe it’s a moot point. In any case, America exists in political and economic systems that profit from the pliability of its populace, and so dedicates its efforts to enforcing that attribute. As Plato predicts, any system existing under a democracy will eventually develop into one where someone like Trump will flourish.

In a bid to overthrow the democratic system, Republicans are actually contemplating blocking Trump’s nomination if he wins. Thwarting the will of the populace may become the last resort of a political party desperately clinging to shreds of sanity. And they are not alone. Isaac Asimov is floating around the internet as a bonafide meme, declaring that “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” This notion that intelligence or sanity supersedes another’s right to vote is thoroughly undemocratic, and suggests some kind of neo-aristocracy to rule over the vulgar masses.

Winston Churchill once said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” In the West, we started with democracy, and after a few affairs with some monarchies, theocracies, and the odd dictatorial despot, we decided to stick with it. Now we seem to be reaping what we’ve sewn. Trump would never be able to attain power in any other form of government outside of a democracy.

So now we are faced with a question: do we continue with Churchill’s worst form of government and just desperately hope that when the inevitable Trumps appear on the ballot that our nations have not reach Idiocratic levels of docility, or do we dream up a better way?

 

I’m pretty sure everyone in Canada, and possibly the world, is terrified of a Trump presidency. The Book of Revelation is pretty specific about what would happen if he were to be elected. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse would rain destruction from the skies, and the music of Metallica would blast across the heavens. Now, as awesome as that actually sounds, it really wouldn’t be because brimstone literally smells like rotten farts, and we would all be on fire or something equally terrible.

Now, without all my humble understatement, let’s take a look at what kind of policies Donald Trump would actually enact if he were to become president.

Trump is a smug, arrogant asshole. I don’t think this is in question. I think his supporters actually like this attribute about him because it comes off as slimy confidence. He decorates his buildings with his name, and pastes them all over town. If he were elected, he would probably rebrand the Republican party as the Trump Government, and enforce it in every facet of the system. On top of this, he might set up a portrait gallery in the American equivalent of the House of Commons, dedicated entirely to himself.

Trump, despite his blustering, is actually as thin-skinned as an overstretched drum. He pettily refuses to engage with Fox News after they asked him a hard question and then reacted harshly when he was confronted on it. I mean, if you can’t be on the same team as the most right wing news source outside of a Ku Klux Klan pamphlet because they hurt your precious feelings, then how do you expect to engage with the rest of the radical left-wing commie pinko news organizations that make up the rest of American media? Well, if he became president, he probably wouldn’t.  He might section off journalists from meetings, or not tell them when important events were happening, or simply just micro-manage what journalists could ask ahead of time. Or he might just screen visitors to his public events so that only people who agree with him can engage with him. Or he might even just limit the amount people can actually ask him so as to limit any opportunity that something hurtful might get through. If you only ever allow those who agree with you to be near you, and limit anything dicey that someone might ask you, then you can avoid any contact with that pernicious dissent that may crop up otherwise.

Now, most of you may remember Trump’s feelings for women. He has no problems being disgustingly derogatory with such comments as to suggest that a female competitor in the Republican race didn’t stand a chance because of how her face looked, or when he suggested that an intrepid female reporter is only asking a hard-hitting question because she is bleeding out of her “whatever.” This comment actually inspired a wonderful artist to create a portrait of The Donald using only her menstrual blood as paint.

comp-donald-trump

It’s uncanny!

What sort of policies do you think this attitude toward women might lead to? That he would cut funding to women’s health organizations is obvious. It’s a given that he would reject trying to end violence against women. He disrespects women so much, he probably wouldn’t even bother talking about important issues that apply to 50% of our population. With Trump in power, it’s quite likely that a nation ranked first in its treatment of women in 1994 would fall to number 23. Wonder what other shitty things Trump might do for women? Read this.

Of course, Trump’s distaste for women and their bodily fluids is comparable only for his distaste for foreigners. Any man who claims that Mexicans are rapists hasn’t got the memo that we’re actually trying to END racism, not endorse it. As president, Trump would likely try to ban any garb that is confusing and frightening to “Old Stock” Americans. Or set up a hotline so fearful white Americans can bring down the hammer on their ethnic neighbours. Trump’s beliefs about foreigners might not lead to an inclusive society, but when it comes to ostracizing racial minorities and promoting xenophobic hatred he has got it in the bag.

Another part of Trump’s legacy of stupidity is that he has gone bankrupt like, a thousand God damn times. Now, bankruptcy is a fine economic practice for those who have gotten into financial hot water, but to repeatedly use it, time and again, shows vastly incompetent economic ability. A Trump presidency would very likely lead to the worst economic record since World War 2. He might defend himself and say that with North America’s aging population, it only makes sense that the economy would falter, but this flies in the face that old people are working just as hard as the rest of us! And also, it is only fair to point out that Trump didn’t cause the 2008 recession that destroyed the world’s economy, but he would have if he could have!

Now, for those of you who read the title and clicked on any number of these news articles I painstakingly researched, you are aware that I’ve been talking about the current prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, this whole time! Trump hasn’t actually done anything terrible yet because he doesn’t have any political power, but it is not difficult to imagine the kind of politician a man with ideologies like Trump would be, and then compare it to the man we have in power in Canada. That’s not even the whole of it. I didn’t include Harper’s disregard of the epidemic of missing and murdered Aboriginal women plaguing our nation, mostly because I didn’t know whether to include it in the racism or sexism part of this blog. The Harper Government has also destroyed much of Canada’s crucial data, to the point where we are blind when it comes to the lives of Canadians because of his destruction of the long form census, and blind to our future because of his defunding of environmental research facilities and the muzzling of climate scientists.

Now, I won’t tell you how to vote. I’ll let this website do it for me. Think voting strategically is stupid? Me too! But under the current system, a vote with ideals is more often than not a wasted vote, as there are usually only two parties in each riding that have a shot at claiming the ballot. A vote for any party other than those other two is just a waste of paper, since the per vote subsidy that gave each party a certain dollar amount for every vote they received was axed by the Conservative government. So there’s not even that going for an ideals vote anymore. However, by voting strategically, you will actually end this shitty first-past-the-post system because every single party except the Conservatives has vowed to alter the electoral system.

So before going to the polls on October 19th, ask yourself: do you want four more years of Donald Trump as your Prime Minister?