Archives for posts with tag: Nazi

In 1933, the population of Jews in Germany numbered around 505, 000. Across Europe, it was around 9.5 million. The Nazis quite infamously thought those numbers were too high, and perpetrated a crime so barbaric that it has forbidden comparison to Nazis ever since because no other crime could ever equate to its astonishing horrors. 6 million of those Jews across Europe were systematically eliminated in industrialized slaughter. The thing is, the Nazis didn’t start with genocide. Despite the long-entrenched dehumanization and vilification of the Jews embedded in German culture at the time, the Nazis were people too, and as a species, people try to avoid murder as best they can. The Nazis wanted to approach the final solution to the Jewish question in a humane way that was a win/win for everyone, so their first attempt was to institute what they called the Madagascar Plan.

That sounds delightful! I’m sure it’s not anything horrible or depressing!

The Madagascar Plan was developed to forcibly relocate European Jews to the island of Madagascar where they could live out the rest of their Jewish lives in nasty, brutish, and short conditions under the watchful and compassionate gaze of the SS. The plan ultimately failed because the Nazis didn’t have the logistics or resources to deport millions of people from the European continent, and decided to try another approach. The elimination of Jews from Europe was the goal, and there were many methods under consideration to achieve that goal. The Holocaust happened through process of elimination since it was the most feasible “solution” under the circumstances provided. The problem is that the goal of ethnic cleansing is always impossible outside of genocide since it is driven by a hateful ideology that does not care for things like reason or logistics, so whether the Nazis could have had enough resources to afford a mass deportation, the result would always have been the same.

Today, Donald Trump has promised to deport 21 million “illegal aliens.” To be clear, the estimates show only around 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States, but it seems that logistics are not under heavy consideration this time around either. He is currently trying to ship all those “illegals” off to El Salvador to live under the watchful and compassionate gaze of the “world’s coolest dictator.” The Republican party seems rapaciously intent on repeating the objectively worst part of history. The absurdity of Trump’s comments about Haitians eating cats and dogs ape the cartoonish depictions of Jews in Nazi propaganda. He mimics the language of Mein Kampf directly when he says that immigrants are poisoning the blood of the country. The parallels to the rise of the Nazi party in the 1930s and the rise of Donald Trump today are not trivial, and portend horrifying disaster.

Now imagine if they had AI making these up!

Trump and his sycophants would say this is about justice; illegal aliens are by definition criminal, and they are responsible for horrific violence against old grandmothers and other symbols of American pristine innocence – just don’t ask for any evidence. But, per this administration, the definition of “criminal” is someone with tattoos. Or the Trump administration might just deport someone by accident, and then laugh it off when they’re called out on it. Or they’re deporting legal residents with green cards or international students because of charges of “antisemitism.” The party that “brought back free speech,” and aligns itself with someone who openly Sieg Heils at the president’s inauguration are worried about antisemitism on university campuses? This is clearly not about justice because Republicans and their devotees are pooh-poohing due process as an impediment to their agenda. They’re telling citizens to self-deport, ominously telling them, “the federal government will find you.”

Trump does not seek justice for Americans, he’s advancing the goals of white nationalism. Look at the names of the green card holders that are at risk of deportation, or the demographics of the students being kidnapped out of their universities. Pro-Palestinian protest is useful because targeting that group allows you to grab a lot of Muslims. If a white person was accidentally deported to El Salvador, do you really think that Donald Trump would hesitate in bringing them back? Do you really think that ICE would have even grabbed them in the first place, wearing masks and chucking them into a panel van? I’m not alone in recognizing this pattern. They’re not being subtle.

Oh yeah, I’m sure they would do this for white folks

I don’t think the 21 million deportations that Trump promised during his campaign was an exaggeration of undocumented immigrant numbers; I think he was suggesting even at that time that he was going to use deportation as a tool of repression of religious and ethnic minorities, and that that number was more what he had in mind as to what was needed to be purged from his country in order to make it pure. The criminality and immigration status were the veneer he was using to sell his ethnic cleansing to the rubes.

Donald Trump wants to deport more than double the amount of Jews that were in Europe at the time of the Holocaust; what happens next if the logistics of his plan fail? What if El Salvador can’t accommodate 21 million people being abducted and shipped off to its torture prisons? What happens when America’s Madagascar Plan fails? Elon Musk wants to “save” civilization by abandoning empathy, just as Hitler said that his followers need to “close [their] hearts to pity” in order to achieve their own ideological goals. Why would we need to harden our hearts in order to tolerate what is come?

Utilitarians have long debated whether it would be ethical to travel back in time to kill Adolf Hitler as a baby, positioning the moral scales as a balance between the Holocaust and World War 2 against the murder of a helpless infant. This is of course absurd because why wouldn’t the time traveler kill Hitler after World War 1 when he was an adult and in jail, as if one needs to murder an infant when a well-placed shank in a prison yard would be equally easy and efficient, and a genocide is prevented either way.

Do they puzzle over the means to do it? Like putting baby Hitler in an oven for the sake of Morissettian irony versus just shaking him until he stops crying?

When we ask the question about what happens next, when the economic war Trump declared on the world fails, when misery exacerbates at home, when everyone is more angry than they’ve ever been before and is looking for someone to blame, we also have to ask what is needed in order to prevent the worst from happening. There are those who believe murdering a baby would be worth it to prevent what happened after the failure of the original Madagascar Plan. Perhaps our modern time traveler only managed to graze an ear.

To be clear, I’m not advocating for more assassination attempts against Donald Trump. Personally, I think violence tends to beget more violence, and a successful assassination could precipitate a civil war – that’s bad! What I am suggesting is that holding up a sign saying you disagree or trying to align with the “good” billionaires is embarrassingly far from what dissidents need to be doing to in order to repudiate the very real potential for an American genocide. YouTube’s first and only News Man Cody Johnston facetiously suggests that Democrats need to start taking shits on the congressional house floor, and while this is clearly a joke, his and my point are essentially the same: resistance needs to be extreme. I’m also suggesting that Republicans need to recognize that the team they’re on is well-past the point of being comparable to actual Nazis, “Roman” salutes and all. As a Canadian, I worry about my own country’s ambivalence toward helping refugees fleeing Trump’s America, as if denying the MS St. Louis entry into our country was a time in our history we ought to emulate. We all need to do better, regardless of our nationality, in how we respond to refugees and immigrants. Fascism is on the rise globally, built predominantly on the vilification of invading immigrants. We all have our part to play, and really, it’s easy enough to start by just being honest in our language about what it is that we’re facing: this is the beginning of an ethnic cleansing driven by the agenda of white nationalism.

Hannah Arendt didn’t write about the banality of evil as it was applied in the context of the Holocaust; Adolf Eichmann was in charge of the Madagascar plan. This is where going through the motions, following the rules, and punching your time card in and out at the murder factory has already brought us. What needs to be disrupted is the very normalcy that engendered this situation before we need another Nuremberg Trial to sift through the ashes once it’s all over. With hindsight, how do we wish the Germans had responded to their government’s crimes against humanity? What level of extremity do you think we would have tolerated? What needs to be done to prevent an American holocaust?

Imagine if the Nazis won the second World War. They lay claim to several African countries, in addition to the European ones they had already blitzed the krieg out of, and planted the Nazi flag in perpetuity. Adolf Hitler, not one to give up power easily, decides to leave the rule of the Nazi party to his children, and his children’s children. The Nazis govern over a solid percentage of the globe, and while those similar enough to an Aryan complexion do okay, the Indigenous populations, racialized populations, and of course the remaining Jews and gypsies are relegated to ghettos to continue to wallow in poverty and oppression. While the direct influence of the Nazi party might wane over time, the influence of its imperialism, genocide, and white supremacy would linger, infecting the cultures of its descendants. Now let’s imagine the great-granddaughter of Adolf, Elizabeth Hitler, was the head of the Nazi party, and she died as a sweet, old woman. Not in a bunker in glorious suicide, but of old age, mere days after performing her duties in on-going Nazi ceremonies.

Artist’s rendition

Would it be appropriate to disparage the good name of Elizabeth Hitler upon her death? Her family mourns her, as all families do, and by all accounts, she was a graceful, dignified Nazi who performed her duties well. In our universe, even making reference to the name Hitler or Nazi is a slur. Those most ideologically similar to the Nazis even reject the term, preferring Western Chauvinists or other such nonsense, to avoid the negative connotation of the Nazi party and their unequivocally evil deeds. Elizabeth Hitler could and should never shed the shame of her surname, so long as the legacy of the Nazi party remained legitimate. And yet the Windsors bear no similar shame.

Am I falling into the Godwin trap? We have collectively agreed that a Nazi comparison is ill-equipped to win arguments because so few tragedies bear commonality to the systematic genocide of six million Jews. If only there were a comparable genocide meted out against a demographic the British Crown considered sub-human, my argument would be saved! Given that I’m a white man whose ancestors settled in a land that wasn’t always bustling with white folks, I think there just might be something there.

It doesn’t count as genocide if you remember it as a gift!

According to some estimates, between 1492 and 1900, approximately 175 million Indigenous people were killed by colonial forces in the Western hemisphere. While the Spanish and Portuguese are certainly responsible for their fair share, I think given the massive Indigenous genocide, it’s fair to make a comparison between the British Empire and the Nazis. Now, it’s hard to say how many the Nazis would have killed if they had 400 years to get all the genocides out of their system, but it’s also hard to say how many the British would have killed if they had the industrial tools the relatively modern Nazi party had at their disposal too. If systematic genocide is the prerequisite for a Nazi comparison, the House of Windsor ought morally to be an equivalent slur to the House of Hitler.

I’m hoping my comparisons have conveyed that there is never an inappropriate time to disparage a royal, since the term “royal” ought to be an insult in and of itself. Monarchy apologists really should be finding euphemisms to hide their ideology similar to our wily “Western Chauvinists”. In addition, while any time is a good time to disrespect the Queen, her death makes it even more appropriate to get nasty about the monarchy because death is the only form of accountability available under a monarchic system.

I’m not a monarchist! I’m a Windsor Enjoyer

Donald Trump infamously stated that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose any votes. Given he could instigate a failed coup and not lose any votes, I think he’s probably right. Then Ron DeSantis would throw a hand grenade into a school bus just to ride on his coattails. The thing is, Trump doesn’t need to lose votes when his supporters are the minority; Trump lost the election, despite all of the hullabaloo. In a Monarchy, the Queen could shoot someone on the London equivalent of Fifth Avenue, her popularity could plummet to zero, and she would still remain in power. That’s the reality of a dictatorship. The only way to get rid of a monarch is either through a violent coup or revolution, or to wait for them to die on their own.

Death is the only opportunity for change in a monarchy outside of the guillotine… which I guess is also death. It’s even illegal in the UK to imagine getting rid of the Queen, which, while practically irrelevant for the entirety of the Queen’s life, is now back to being relevant as those publicly questioning the legitimacy of King Charles are being arrested for it. While I doubt the republican repression will last, its enforcement during this vulnerable transition of power is telling.

Charles is an old guy. He won’t be king for as long as Elizabeth. When he dies, I hope many more of us will find it in our hearts to be a bit more rude over it. And keep being rude over it, until the legitimacy of the British Empire and its symbols get the recognition they deserve.

Long may he reign

Post-Script: I do not give a single fuck if any of you Windsor-Enjoyers out there point out that different Houses of Lords had different surnames throughout the British Empire. I’m trying to keep my metaphors simple. Chill your balls.