I’m pretty sure everyone in Canada, and possibly the world, is terrified of a Trump presidency. The Book of Revelation is pretty specific about what would happen if he were to be elected. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse would rain destruction from the skies, and the music of Metallica would blast across the heavens. Now, as awesome as that actually sounds, it really wouldn’t be because brimstone literally smells like rotten farts, and we would all be on fire or something equally terrible.

Now, without all my humble understatement, let’s take a look at what kind of policies Donald Trump would actually enact if he were to become president.

Trump is a smug, arrogant asshole. I don’t think this is in question. I think his supporters actually like this attribute about him because it comes off as slimy confidence. He decorates his buildings with his name, and pastes them all over town. If he were elected, he would probably rebrand the Republican party as the Trump Government, and enforce it in every facet of the system. On top of this, he might set up a portrait gallery in the American equivalent of the House of Commons, dedicated entirely to himself.

Trump, despite his blustering, is actually as thin-skinned as an overstretched drum. He pettily refuses to engage with Fox News after they asked him a hard question and then reacted harshly when he was confronted on it. I mean, if you can’t be on the same team as the most right wing news source outside of a Ku Klux Klan pamphlet because they hurt your precious feelings, then how do you expect to engage with the rest of the radical left-wing commie pinko news organizations that make up the rest of American media? Well, if he became president, he probably wouldn’t.  He might section off journalists from meetings, or not tell them when important events were happening, or simply just micro-manage what journalists could ask ahead of time. Or he might just screen visitors to his public events so that only people who agree with him can engage with him. Or he might even just limit the amount people can actually ask him so as to limit any opportunity that something hurtful might get through. If you only ever allow those who agree with you to be near you, and limit anything dicey that someone might ask you, then you can avoid any contact with that pernicious dissent that may crop up otherwise.

Now, most of you may remember Trump’s feelings for women. He has no problems being disgustingly derogatory with such comments as to suggest that a female competitor in the Republican race didn’t stand a chance because of how her face looked, or when he suggested that an intrepid female reporter is only asking a hard-hitting question because she is bleeding out of her “whatever.” This comment actually inspired a wonderful artist to create a portrait of The Donald using only her menstrual blood as paint.

comp-donald-trump

It’s uncanny!

What sort of policies do you think this attitude toward women might lead to? That he would cut funding to women’s health organizations is obvious. It’s a given that he would reject trying to end violence against women. He disrespects women so much, he probably wouldn’t even bother talking about important issues that apply to 50% of our population. With Trump in power, it’s quite likely that a nation ranked first in its treatment of women in 1994 would fall to number 23. Wonder what other shitty things Trump might do for women? Read this.

Of course, Trump’s distaste for women and their bodily fluids is comparable only for his distaste for foreigners. Any man who claims that Mexicans are rapists hasn’t got the memo that we’re actually trying to END racism, not endorse it. As president, Trump would likely try to ban any garb that is confusing and frightening to “Old Stock” Americans. Or set up a hotline so fearful white Americans can bring down the hammer on their ethnic neighbours. Trump’s beliefs about foreigners might not lead to an inclusive society, but when it comes to ostracizing racial minorities and promoting xenophobic hatred he has got it in the bag.

Another part of Trump’s legacy of stupidity is that he has gone bankrupt like, a thousand God damn times. Now, bankruptcy is a fine economic practice for those who have gotten into financial hot water, but to repeatedly use it, time and again, shows vastly incompetent economic ability. A Trump presidency would very likely lead to the worst economic record since World War 2. He might defend himself and say that with North America’s aging population, it only makes sense that the economy would falter, but this flies in the face that old people are working just as hard as the rest of us! And also, it is only fair to point out that Trump didn’t cause the 2008 recession that destroyed the world’s economy, but he would have if he could have!

Now, for those of you who read the title and clicked on any number of these news articles I painstakingly researched, you are aware that I’ve been talking about the current prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, this whole time! Trump hasn’t actually done anything terrible yet because he doesn’t have any political power, but it is not difficult to imagine the kind of politician a man with ideologies like Trump would be, and then compare it to the man we have in power in Canada. That’s not even the whole of it. I didn’t include Harper’s disregard of the epidemic of missing and murdered Aboriginal women plaguing our nation, mostly because I didn’t know whether to include it in the racism or sexism part of this blog. The Harper Government has also destroyed much of Canada’s crucial data, to the point where we are blind when it comes to the lives of Canadians because of his destruction of the long form census, and blind to our future because of his defunding of environmental research facilities and the muzzling of climate scientists.

Now, I won’t tell you how to vote. I’ll let this website do it for me. Think voting strategically is stupid? Me too! But under the current system, a vote with ideals is more often than not a wasted vote, as there are usually only two parties in each riding that have a shot at claiming the ballot. A vote for any party other than those other two is just a waste of paper, since the per vote subsidy that gave each party a certain dollar amount for every vote they received was axed by the Conservative government. So there’s not even that going for an ideals vote anymore. However, by voting strategically, you will actually end this shitty first-past-the-post system because every single party except the Conservatives has vowed to alter the electoral system.

So before going to the polls on October 19th, ask yourself: do you want four more years of Donald Trump as your Prime Minister?

Conservative Government Reacts to Influx of Buddhist Terrorism

http://www.kymonews.com/news/national/conservative-government-reacts-to-influx-of-buddhist-terrorism/article5633562/

As more and more extremist Buddhists rain terror down on Rohingya Muslims in Burma, the Canadian government has issued statements condemning the violence.

“Terrorism could begin in a basement, a temple, or somewhere else,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in a press conference last Thursday.”We are in the process of introducing plans to make a lack of serenity mandatory while participating in the citizenship ceremony. Enlightenment is not congruent with Canadian interests and values. If you are one with the universe, you are not one with Canada.”

Locals are becoming uneasy, fearing their neighbour could be a Buddhist terrorist waiting to strike. Resident Laura Walker was interviewed, and told KYMO News of her concerns. “What’s stopping a Buddhist from walking into an airport, and self-immolating themselves on a plane? Anyone willing to sacrifice their own life for their radical idealism has been brainwashed by their religious leaders, and is a threat to us all. Eliminating the public display of serenity is not enough to fight back against those Saffron-Robers, we need stricter airport security measures to keep these extremists from hurting innocent civilians! It even says in their holy text that they want to bring nirvana to all of humanity. I looked up what nirvana means, and it means extinction!”

While some claim that Buddhism is a religion of peace, the debate rages on about how far Canadians should allow the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Charter to accommodate a religion shown to commit terrible violence against an oppressed Muslim minority.

There are many reasons for spiritual belief. Some of them are written up quite eloquently and humbly here. However, organized religion gets a bit more flack because, as an institution, it’s more rigid in its dogma and has an easier time enforcing it. Of course, that’s how organizations work. If ideas aren’t preserved, and organizations aren’t built up around them, they perish. As much as Jesus may have done while he was alive, if it wasn’t for Peter, there would be no Christianity today.

On the other hand, being advented 2000 years ago causes a lot of the problems many people have with Christianity today. But think about Planned Parenthood. The brick and mortar of this institution is built on eugenics and racism. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, is often misquoted as saying terrible things. Here’s an actual quotation from Sanger:

Birth control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.

Doesn’t she sound lovely?

Denying the less-than-illustrious origins of Planned Parenthood is naive and disingenuous. So too is denying the good that came of it. Ideas, like everything else, evolve over time. Christianity is not the same as it was 2000 years ago, and arguing that it is is preposterous.

Leviticus, the book that harps on gay people the most, is also chalk-full of disparaging comments towards shellfish and tattoos. Today, you don’t see anyone going to prison for refusing to give someone their tramp stamp. And as much as you want to blame religion for the hatred of gays, remember that the Bible doesn’t say anything about hating black people or Mexicans. Homophobia comes from the same place as racism: hate, and hatred is borne out of xenophobia and ignorance, not religion. I’ll say it again: beliefs change with the times, just like everything else.

Some might argue that the Bible purports the “truth”, and the “truth” cannot evolve. Maybe; maybe not. However, our understanding of the truth certainly can.

But Dan, why is arbitrarily casting aside some beliefs while holding on to others okay? That doesn’t make any sense. In fact, there is a lot within religion that doesn’t make any sense!

True enough, Other Dan. There is irrationality within religion.

Think about ‘hope’ for a minute. Think about ‘worry.’ We can’t know the future, so attributing a positive or a negative to it is pointless. Now think about ‘love’ and ‘trust.’ We can never truly know the mind of another individual, and we are often surprised by the actions of people we thought we understood. Why would we ever cherish these totally irrational emotional connections?

Many things about human existence are without logic, but perhaps that’s because the human race needs something more than reason can adequately provide on its own.

Historically, religion has a pretty bad reputation as well. Critics relish pointing to the inquisition and the crusades as damning evidence of religion’s evil. They always seem to forget that England and France went to war for literally a hundred years! (Literally 116 years) They also went to war for literally (yes, again) the same reasons the Church perpetrated the crusades and the inquisition: the accumulation of power and wealth.

The Church also brought Europe into the dark ages by burning books and declaring heretical any knowledge that disagreed with their teachings. Stephen Harper eliminated the long form census, defunded environmental agencies, and muzzled climate scientists. FOR LITERALLY THE SAME REASON! DOUBLE AGAIN! If you want to consolidate power, keep people ignorant of views that might oppose your own.

There are oppressive power structures within the religious institutions, yes. But condemning religion for that oppression is the same as condemning men because of the oppressive power structures of the patriarchy. It’s easy and a lot of fun, but ultimately it’s ineffectual and alienating because it’s not the root issue of the problem and you’re going to piss a lot of people off for no reason.

For those wondering, Margaret Sanger’s dream of “extirpating” “racial” “weeds” is still progressing at a fine pace. Look at these pretty graphs:

That's a lot of abortions!

That’s a lot of abortions!

Did they make white people "blue" so that they wouldn't disappear into the background of the graph?

I wonder if they made white people ‘denim’ for any reason in particular.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For those who can’t figure it out from these graphs, despite being 63% of the population in the US, white people account for only 34% of abortions. Blacks, at 13.1% of the population make up 37% of the abortions, and Latinos, for 16.9%, make up 22%. That’s pretty fucked.

I think most everyone recognizes that the racial effects of Planned Parenthood do not lie in the institution, however, but in the systemic racism that puts racial minorities in segregated, impoverished neighbourhood. It is, after all, poverty that typically leads people toward abortion, so an attack on the institution that provides them is infantile.

So why attack the institution of religion? Promote plurality instead of xenophobia. Education instead of ignorance. Peace instead of war. Fight oppressive power structures, but identify them appropriately as separate from their attachments. Ideas and beliefs can only change when the world around them does first.